The Supreme Court is set to overturn Friday’s ruling Cry v. Wade And Planned Parenthood vs. CaseyCases defining abortion as a constitutional right will negatively affect the ability of many students to attend college and finish in the coming years. Research shows that women from lower socio-economic backgrounds are more likely to take a break from their studies to care for children than other groups of students.
Less prevalent, though speculative about it, is the impact this decision has on students – and staff and faculty members – in choosing a college.
It remains true, one enrollment expert said, that the ability to go to college in another state is usually a privilege reserved for wealthy students.
In the decision of the Supreme Court for some students Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Other factors – such as laws against important caste principles and attempts to pass anti-transgender bills – that make them feel insecure in a group of states, affect the list of institutions they choose to apply for or attend. But scholars and administrators say the vast majority of college students are enrolled near where they live Dubs There may be no change.
Emma Kasas, a high school senior from Omaha, Neb, understands that. She considers herself lucky to be able to consider colleges in other states. Kas said Dubs Her decision to pursue college changed her mind completely. The University of Nebraska at Lincoln was his first choice, as it would have financial meaning and would allow him to live closer to home. Not sure if she wants to stay now.
While Nebraska does not have a trigger law that automatically prohibits abortion following a Supreme Court ruling, Republican governors are expected to convene a special session soon to try to pass an abortion ban in the state.
“Where the money goes is really important,” Casas said. “I’m reluctant to spend money on education in the state, especially with governors like Pete Ricketts in Nebraska.”
‘Access to Reproductive Health Care’
Growing up in high school from San Jose, California, senior Ambika Ramadurai said she was initially open to going to college in states across the country, now she is reconsidering whether to apply to states like Texas, where abortion is prohibited and there will be more. May be invalid
She said reproductive health care in particular is unequally less accessible to people of color already, she is concerned about attending abortion illegal state colleges.
“As a woman, but as a woman of color, I think it’s really important that the schools I look at are schools in states that give me access to abortion if I need to, and also general access. For reproductive health care,” she said.
Agnes Scott College, Atlanta, was one of Ashna Parekh’s top picks. It’s a small, diverse liberal arts college, and she can’t wait to apply. But on Friday morning, the rising senior Parekh of Irvine, California, woke up to the news. Cry. She cried for her mother and immediately realized that this decision could have a big impact on her life. Georgia has not banned abortion but is expected to do so soon.
“I didn’t feel safe at the time,” Parekh said. “I removed it completely from my list.”
College counselors said the narrative evidence suggests that many of their students have options to study where abortion law is concerned. Arun Ponusami, a California-based counselor, said earlier Monday that a student had said he wanted to remove Texas A&M University from college station from his list, apparently not because of the abortion decision, but he said, “It’s just that. I’m not who I am.” Ponnusami envisioned, however, that smaller private colleges that rely on students who can pay full rent will feel the most of the decision. Lauren Cook, dean of college counseling at Gulf Jewish Community High School, a small private school in San Francisco, said students have been talking about which state will ban abortion from 2015 onwards. Dubs The decision was leaked in May.
Some researchers and higher-education administrators have estimated that the overall impact on college admissions will not be very significant.
“The majority of students go to college within 100 miles of their home,” said Terry Hartle, senior vice president for government relations and public affairs at the American Council on Education. “It hasn’t changed for generations. It’s hard to imagine a single event changing that.”
For admission to Oregon State University, Vice President John Bockenstad analyzed the out-of-state population of colleges. Dubs Rule in a recent post on your blog about higher education data.
“Politics or the weather, whether it’s the weather or the political environment, has always played a role,” he said in an interview. “It may be a little different. I don’t necessarily think it’s the SCOTUS regime. I think it’s the state’s response and what it says, especially to young women but also to young men.”
As of Tuesday, seven states had banned almost all abortions, according to the report New York Times. Most states are expected to ban the process soon in most cases. Although thousands of students reacted by changing the decision of where to go to college, Bokensted said, Dubs The decision is unlikely to change the landscape of college admissions. It remains true, he said, that the ability to go to college in another state is generally a privilege reserved for wealthy students.
Not students, faculty
John V. Winters, a professor of economics at Iowa State University who has studied college-student migration, said in an email that large public universities in the South that attract students from outside the state take students from nearby states, which often have similar abortion laws.
“For UT-Austin, in particular, if some people decide to attend elsewhere, the university will roll down their waiting list and bring in as many students as they want,” he said.
Winters added that students going out of state for college may also be able to travel to a different state for abortion. But there is one constituency that he thinks will make the abortion ban effective when choosing a university: faculty members.
Elizabeth Eger, an art-history scholar at the University of Texas, whom she asked not to be named, spent last year on research vacation in California. On Monday, three days after the Supreme Court’s decision came down, two moving containers were ready to fill his driveway with his family’s belongings and taken back to Texas.
But Eger spent weekends on the phone with her sisters and friends in both Texas and California, worrying about the Supreme Court’s decision and the return.
“There’s a philosophical question of living in a regime that doesn’t believe I’m a fully autonomous human being with the power to make decisions about me,” Eger said. Then there are the practical questions. She has already given birth, but what if she becomes pregnant again? What happens if she has an abortion and then suspects an illegal abortion?
Some online comments among academics include calls to boycott conferences and presentations in abortion-prohibited states. She is anxious.
“The friends I talk to really find it scary and isolated,” she said. “Conversations about gender, race, physical autonomy are really what the Republican Party wants. Moving those conversations away from Texas seems unfavorable.
Raisa Rexer is an assistant professor of French at Vanderbilt University. Rexer is in the same position as Eger. She spent the last year in Brooklyn, on vacation, and plans to return to Nashville in August. For Rexer, deciding whether or not to live in Tennessee, where abortion bans are expected to apply, is a moral one. She worries that living in Tennessee will make her engage with laws that she disagrees with.
“The thing that bothers me the most is the sense of moral weight,” she said. “So much contradicts my beliefs.”
Rexer said she would help her students at the beginning of each semester if something happened to them, such as being sexually abused, although she reminded them she was a compulsory reporter. Once a year, a student asks for this kind of help. Rexer thinks that if a student later helps to have an illegal abortion, she may one day be held responsible.
Thinking about quitting also feels like a privilege for Rexer. So far, he plans to stay.
“Deciding to leave or stay where the laws are contrary to our personal beliefs means we are abandoning our careers,” she said. Rexer’s research area is 19th-century French literature and culture, and the year he was employed at Vanderbilt, three positions were available throughout the country. It is not easy to pick it up and move to another state.
Isha Trivedi contributed reporting.